Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2017 9:19:38 GMT -7
It does beg the question... Why is our universe so rich in matter, but so lean in anti-matter? What mechanism in the Big Bang caused such a prevalence of "matter"? If particles Matter and Anti-Matter are always created in pairs, and destroy each other if the meet, shouldn't the universe be made up of nothing but the energy left over from all those Matter-Anti-Matter explosions?
|
|
|
|
Post by starcruiser on Dec 8, 2017 17:25:22 GMT -7
Unless anti-matter is actually repelled from matter and therefore has to be forced to collide. I think that is where the article is heading.
It could be possible that anti-matter may not clump together like normal matter and may form loose strings in the void spaces away from clusters of galaxies. This could explain both the whole "Dark Energy" and "Dark Matter" issues created by physicists to fill in gaps in their formulas. The original intent in creating those was just to provide some means to reconcile what they were getting from experiments and observations and could not explain with existing theories and mathematics.
If this is correct, it explains many things and, as usual, opens up a whole new can o' worms!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2017 14:50:26 GMT -7
That's the way I read it as well. Anti-Matter is just as "visible" as normal matter. So... I can't find anything on the interwebs explaining how we could tell the difference between a star made of matter or a star made of anti-matter. I do see that if a star cluster contained both types of matter, we would see a lot of gamma bursts form matter-anti-matter interactions. Unless the article is correct and the two repel one another... ok... I agree...  |
|
