atolm
Commander
Posts: 857
|
Post by atolm on Apr 16, 2021 16:16:30 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by brickwall on Apr 16, 2021 16:22:38 GMT -7
Looks very good. Hefty and built for long endurance. If the modules are detachable, it looks like it could also carry cargo pods in an emergency.
|
|
|
|
Post by trynda1701 on Apr 16, 2021 16:40:20 GMT -7
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2021 17:00:52 GMT -7
There ya GO!
I like that a lot.
|
|
|
|
Post by kaisernathan1701 on Apr 16, 2021 19:27:37 GMT -7
nicely designed cargo ship  |
|
|
|
Post by thescreamingswede on Apr 16, 2021 23:02:05 GMT -7
Now that's a cool design but something is amiss. It's like it's off centre or something. It could be a trick of the eyes due to the perspective but to me it's throwing the nacelles off. One looks further ahead and higher than the other. I think your centre spine along the top is angled wrong.
Nevertheless, I really like this concept and design a lot. Keep up the good work.
|
|
atolm
Commander
Posts: 857
|
Post by atolm on Apr 17, 2021 4:29:54 GMT -7
Looks very good. Hefty and built for long endurance. If the modules are detachable, it looks like it could also carry cargo pods in an emergency. Aye they are detachable. Thanks! Nice utilitarian design for TOS. Cool work as always, atolm !  Thanks. Not my most refined work, but I had sketched her out and wanted to giver her some kind of depth, so I coloured her up. There ya GO! I like that a lot. Hey thanks mate. nicely designed cargo ship Thanks. Now that's a cool design but something is amiss. It's like it's off centre or something. It could be a trick of the eyes due to the perspective but to me it's throwing the nacelles off. One looks further ahead and higher than the other. I think your centre spine along the top is angled wrong. Nevertheless, I really like this concept and design a lot. Keep up the good work. You are correct...there are a few things "off": the nacelle closest to us (the starboard one) is actually too short in length, and due to the curved nature of the hull extrusions, the curves are a tad off on the portside aspect of the hull. Lastly, the placement of the portside nacelle and pylon are a tad too far back on the aft hull superstructure. All this happens when a concept sketch is not reworked into a refined line drawing, but rather, just doodled out for the concept. Thanks! I was planning to do a more with this design, so stay tuned  |
|
atolm
Commander
Posts: 857
|
Post by atolm on Apr 17, 2021 11:19:02 GMT -7
thescreamingswede and everyone else, I just corrected the image using a bit of cg tom foolery...lol Not perfect, but it does help a bit.
|
|
atolm
Commander
Posts: 857
|
Post by atolm on Apr 17, 2021 15:19:48 GMT -7
|
|
bernard Guignard
Lieutenant
Trek Canon!!! I NO believe in TreK Canon!!!.
Posts: 137
|
Post by bernard Guignard on Apr 18, 2021 4:49:09 GMT -7
Really enjoying the orthographic views |
|
|
|
Post by SITZKRIEG! on Apr 18, 2021 8:24:26 GMT -7
It's a cool design! I initially didn't pick up on the detachability from the pods until you posted the orthos. I never know if it's kosher to ask questions or make suggestions but any thoughts on making the front half an integrated saucer (like the Ships of the Line calendar Bonaventure class) with a more prominent bridge section while keeping the back square?
|
|
|
|
Post by trynda1701 on Apr 18, 2021 11:51:04 GMT -7
It's a cool design! I initially didn't pick up on the detachability from the pods until you posted the orthos. I never know if it's kosher to ask questions or make suggestions but any thoughts on making the front half an integrated saucer (like the Ships of the Line calendar Bonaventure class) with a more prominent bridge section while keeping the back square? I'd leave it as is. The central spine invokes the Bonaventure class from the Ships of the Line calenders, as well as the FASA Marklin class, so I don't think it needs a saucer. The spine is a common design elements of the three classes, and the nacelles say Federation anyway. Just my two credits worth! EDIT: How big would this design be, atolm? |
|
atolm
Commander
Posts: 857
|
Post by atolm on Apr 20, 2021 18:03:53 GMT -7
Really enjoying the orthographic views Thanks. And glad you like them. It's a cool design! I initially didn't pick up on the detachability from the pods until you posted the orthos. I never know if it's kosher to ask questions or make suggestions but any thoughts on making the front half an integrated saucer (like the Ships of the Line calendar Bonaventure class) with a more prominent bridge section while keeping the back square? Never a problem asking me anything or giving suggestions, as even if I do not use them in the design presented, I may in a future concept. We are a community after all Our man trynda1701 has done a great reply that mirrors my feelings on the subject, but again..I 'll keep it under advisement for future endeavours. It's a cool design! I initially didn't pick up on the detachability from the pods until you posted the orthos. I never know if it's kosher to ask questions or make suggestions but any thoughts on making the front half an integrated saucer (like the Ships of the Line calendar Bonaventure class) with a more prominent bridge section while keeping the back square? I'd leave it as is. The central spine invokes the Bonaventure class from the Ships of the Line calenders, as well as the FASA Marklin class, so I don't think it needs a saucer. The spine is a common design elements of the three classes, and the nacelles say Federation anyway. Just my two credits worth! EDIT: How big would this design be, atolm? Thanks for fielding that for me And you are correct. I am leaving the vessel as is lol Her size is rather large...the bridge superstructure is roughly the same size as a Connie's, that makes her larger. |
|
